Preparing to be a Witness

Important information for students, faculty, staff, or others who have been called to appear as witnesses for the Washington College Honor Board

Appearing as a witness at a Washington College Honor Board hearing is an important and vital aspect of the College’s commitment to upholding the Honor Code. While sometimes the role of witness can be uncomfortable and/or difficult it is a role that is integral to the Board’s ability to determine a student’s responsibility for violations of College policy.

The purpose of the Washington College Honor Board is to adjudicate cases of alleged violations of the Washington College Honor Code and determine whether or not students brought before the board are responsible for violating the Honor Code or specific College policy. These violations may be academic or social violations of the Honor Code. Students attending Honor Board hearings as witnesses often have many questions and concerns about the process. The information below is meant to address those questions and concerns and help students be prepared for the hearing. Questions that are not answered below can be directed Candace Wannamaker, Associate Vice President for Student Affairs (cwannamaker2 or ext. 7752).

Structure of the Honor Board

The Honor Board is composed of both students and faculty members. Students are named to the Honor Board by the SGA Review Board through an application and interview process. Nine students are selected, and they rotate throughout the year as one of the three participating members at any given hearing. Five faculty members are appointed to the Honor Board with just two participating on a panel at any given hearing. The Honor Board is presided over by the student chairperson who is an advisory member of the board. Other advisory members of the Board include a representative from the Provost’s Office (currently Prof. Aaron Krochmal) and the Dean of Students designee (currently Assoc. VP Candace Wannamaker).

Honor Board Hearing Procedures

The Honor Board hearing generally follows the following agenda (although minor changes may be made in this agenda depending upon the nature of the case):

1

Call to Order

Honor Board Chair

2

Introduction of Honor Board Members

Honor Board Members

3

Alleged Violations Stated

Honor Board Chair

4

Opening Statements

Student Complainant and Student Respondent

5

Questioning of Case Witnesses (one at a time)

Honor Board Members; Student Respondent and Student Complainant

6

Questioning of Complainant

Honor Board Members; Respondent

7

Questioning of Respondent

Honor Board Members; Complainant

8

Complainant Closing Statement

Student Complainant

9

Respondent Closing Statement

Student Respondent

11

Dismissal of Complainant

Honor Board Chair

12

Dismissal of Respondent

Honor Board Chair

13

Deliberation (Responsible or Not Responsible)

Honor Board Members

14

Decision (Responsible or Not Responsible)

Honor Board Members

15

Report on prior violations or incidents

Assoc. VP for Student Affairs and/or designee

16

Deliberation of Sanction if in violation

Honor Board Members

17

Decision on Sanction if in violation

Honor Board Members

18

Dismissal of Honor Board Members

Honor Board Chair           

Witnesses normally wait in a location near the hearing room and are called into the hearing by the Honor Board chair or an administrator when it is time for them to present their statement. Steps are sometimes taken to ensure that witnesses do not have contact with accused students outside of the hearing room (although they do not have to be separated if both parties agree). Except in unusual cases, witnesses are asked to give their statements with the accused student in the hearing room. This allows the accused student to ask questions of the witness (after the Board asks its questions) if that student so desires. If witnesses have concerns about having contact with the accused student at any time during the hearing, they should let Interim Dean Krikorian (gkrikorian2) know this ahead of time so arrangements can be discussed.

Witnesses will be informed about the location for the hearing prior to the hearing.

Appropriate Dress

Persons who appear at Honor Board hearings (both respondents and witnesses) should keep in mind that their appearance can send a message about how seriously they are taking the hearing and their respect for the process. There is no specific dress code for students appearing before the Honor Board, but it is recommended that students avoid overly casual clothes and consider their credibility when deciding what to wear.

Types of Witnesses

There are two types of witnesses that can be present at Honor Board hearings, case witnesses and character witnesses. Case witnesses are those who have factual knowledge about the alleged violation. Character witnesses usually do not have any factual knowledge about the alleged offense but are able to speak to the character of the student brought before the board. Because character witnesses cannot be questioned by the board or the respondent, character witnesses normally provide a written statement to the board prior to the hearing and do not appear at the hearing. Their statements are provided to the panel either before or during the hearing.

Case witnesses make their statement at the hearing and will present their statement to the board. After the case witness’s statement, the board and the respondent will have the opportunity to question that witness.

When the student brought before the board is notified that he/she will appear before the Honor Board, he/she must provide the Honor Board Chair the names of any witnesses he/she wishes to present at the hearing. Those names must be sent to the Honor Board Chair no later than four class days prior to the hearing. Witnesses can also be called by the administrators (representatives of the Dean of Students or Provost’s Office) who are facilitating the hearing. These Honor Board administrators make the final decision about which witnesses will appear at the hearing.

Witness Statements

When witnesses are called into a hearing, they are requested to present a statement in front of the entire board as well as the respondent. Case witnesses are asked to recount their version of the incident in question from start to finish. This can take anywhere from 30 seconds to several minutes, depending upon the nature of the incident. He/she will then be asked questions by the Honor Board to help clarify and gather as much information as possible. In many cases, witnesses will have already submitted a witness statement via Public Safety. The Honor Board members will normally have copies of those statements prior to the hearing. The accused student/respondent also has access to those statements to help him/her prepare for the hearing. Witnesses who do not have a copy of these statements but would like to obtain a copy to prepare for the hearing should contact either the Student Affairs Office (for social violation cases) or Prof. Krochmal (for academic cases). It is vital for witnesses to appear at the hearing itself because it allows the board to better understand the facts of the case and come to the most appropriate decision about responsibility and possibly, sanctions.

When called as a witness during and Honor Board Hearing, it is imperative at students understand that they must provide truthful information to the panel.  In some cases, if it is discovered that an individual is intentionally not telling the truth, it would be considered a violation of the honor code. 

Specifically, a student could be charged with the following violation:

Dishonesty: Providing intentionally false or misleading information or statements to any College or community official.

Specific violations of this standard include (but are not limited to):

  • Making a false or misleading oral or written statement to any College official or faculty member (including, but not limited to, application for admission, financial aid, residency classification, or participation in any special programs sponsored by Washington College) when the student knew or should have known the statement was false
  • Making a false or misleading oral or written statement at any point in the student conduct process or any other process used to address student behavior
  • Making a false or misleading oral or written statement that misrepresents the character, qualifications, or reputation of another
  • Falsely reporting a safety hazard (including, but not limited to, a fire, explosive, or incendiary device) by any means, including by activating an emergency phone on campus when no emergency actually exists
  • Intentionally falsely reporting a crime or violation of this Code of Conduct or any other College policy
  • Forgery

Character witnesses should be other Washington College students, faculty, or staff members who know the respondent well. Character witnesses should prepare a brief (1-2 page) statement regarding the character of the accused student, including any significant contributions the student has made to the campus community. Since the Honor Board does not ask questions of character witnesses, they normally do not attend hearings but rather submit their statements prior to the hearing. 

More Information

More information about the student judicial process can be found by contacting Interim Dean of Students Greg Krikorian  (gkrikorian2FREEwashcoll).